Lake Chapala is the largest natural freshwater lake in Mexico. It’s the main source of drinking water for Guadalajara and home to a wide array of fish and migratory birds. It has also evolved into a growing oasis for tourism and recreation, however, there were many stresses facing this dynamic water source.
Safeguarding Public Health With UV Disinfection
Its average annual evaporation (1,910 mm) greatly exceeds annual precipitation (781 mm in average) and the treatment and quality of wastewater being discharged into it had come under increased scrutiny.
The State Water Commission of Jalisco (CEA Jalisco) is responsible for several municipal wastewater (activated sludge) treatment plants discharging into Lake Chapala. Prior to 2011, the majority of plants – including the one in San Juan Cosala – were disinfecting with chlorine gas. However, the growing concerns over toxic chemical residuals and disinfection by-products negatively impacting the aquatic life prompted CEA Jalisco to consider adding a dechlorination process.
Although adding dechlorination to the treatment process would significantly lower the risk of discharging toxic chlorine into the lake, CEA Jalisco still had safety concerns; operators would still be dealing with hazardous and volatile chlorine gas and neighboring communities would still be at risk should a chlorine leak ever occur.
Evaluating Disinfection Alternatives
For the San Juan Cosala plant, CEA Jalisco evaluated disinfection using sodium hypochlorite and also considered moving away from chemical disinfection entirely and converting to ultraviolet (UV) disinfection.
Sodium hypochlorite is a diluted liquid form of chlorine. It is a clear, yellow liquid that is corrosive. It is not as volatile or toxic as chlorine gas, nor does it have the same disastrous potential in the event of a spill or release. However, just like chlorine gas it too can create disinfection by-products and would require a dechlorination step.
Alternatively, UV disinfection is an inherently safe, physical process that instantaneously disinfects microorganisms as they pass by UV lamps submerged in the wastewater effluent. It is effective against chlorineresistant Cryptosporidium and Giardia (pathogens in surface water sources that can ultimately find their way into drinking water supplies). The UV disinfection process adds nothing to the water but UV light, and therefore, has no impact on the chemical composition of the water.
As a result, CEA Jalisco considered and evaluated three options:
- Adding a dechlorination step after their existing chlorination process
- Replacing chlorine with sodium hypochlorite disinfection as well as adding a dechlorination step
- Converting to UV disinfection and eliminating chlorination and dechlorination chemicals altogether
CEA Jalisco Chose UV
Following an extensive evaluation process, CEA Jalisco selected the TrojanUV3000Plus™ – an open channel system with horizontal low-pressure high-output lamps.
Factors considered during the decision-making process:
- ActiClean™ lamp sleeve cleaning
- Cleaning occurs automatically while the lamps are disinfecting, and maintains at least 95% transmittance, ensuring sleeves are clean and the system is consistently delivering accurate dose
- Proven local installations
- Reputable local representative offering technical expertise and services
- Integrated service network throughout Mexico streamlines equipment support, troubleshooting and maintenance
When converting from chlorine to UV, existing chlorine contact tanks are often used for a retrofit. This is the approach CEA Jalisco took; not only does it reduce construction costs, it also enables surplus portions of old chlorine contact tanks to be used for water storage, bypass and other purposes.
The first UV installation was completed in 2011. When the entire project is completed, a total of six CEA Jalisco wastewater treatment plants discharging to Lake Chapala will be using the TrojanUV3000Plus disinfection system.
System Design Parameters
|Peak Design Flow||40 L/S (0.9 MGD)|
|UV Transmittance (UVT)||60%|
|Disinfection Limit||1000 FC/100mL|
|Secondary Treatment||Conventional Activated Sludge|
Top 5 Misconceptions About UV
- UV is expensive The lifecycle cost for UV is typically lower compared to chlorination/dechorination. Although the initial capital cost for UV equipment may be higher, plants do realize operating savings with UV compared to chemical disinfection, thus resulting in net payback of the UV equipment over a few years.
- UV requires too much maintenance
Our UV systems operate automatically, and the primary maintenance procedure is lamp replacement (which usually happens every 18 months or so). Most of our customers also opt for our patented ActiClean lamp sleeve cleaning system.This automatic system eliminates fouling, reduces manual maintenance and increases efficiency. And remember, you don’t have any of the worries associated with a chlorine system – no safety certifications, chemicals management or equipment corrosion.
- UV is not as effective as chlorine in low quality water application
Our UV disinfection systems are installed around the world, effectively treating all types of challenging water qualities, including combined sewer overflows (CSO), storm and sanitary sewer overflows (SSO), primary and blended effluents.
- UV is complicated and we don’t understand how it work
UV disinfection is a relatively simple technology to grasp. And you can easily educate yourself through online research or by attending relevant conferences and workshops.We’re honored to be asked to speak at various conferences around the world and also host free UV workshops from time to time – ask us when we’ll be in your area next.
- Operators are not skilled enough to operate UV
No special skills, licenses or education required. And our authorized service technicians provide operators with in-depth training, troubleshooting techniques and maintenance protocol. We also have local service representatives in Mexico should onsite support ever be needed.